Puja J. Umaretiya, MD, Sara S. Oberhelman, MD, Elizabeth W. Cozine, MD, Julie A. Maxson, BA, Stephanie M. Quigg and Tom D. Thacher, MD (2017) Ann Fam Med 15(1) 68-70
Vitamin D deficiency has become a global public health concern. Nutritional rickets is the most established consequence, and an increasing incidence of rickets has been observed in developed countries. In one study up to 18% of US children were vitamin D deficient, and 1% had severe deficiency.
Breastfed infants are vulnerable to vitamin D deficiency because of the low concentration of vitamin D in breast milk. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommends supplementation of breastfed, partially breastfed, and bottle-fed infants with vitamin D at 400 IU/d, beginning in the first few days of life. Adherence to this recommendation, however, is poor.
Several studies have explored alternative methods of supplementation. Breast milk can be enriched with vitamin D through daily or intermittent high-dose maternal supplementation to meet infants’ vitamin D requirements. Alternatively, oral vitamin D, 50,000 IU every 2 months, can be given to healthy infants with routine vaccinations to prevent vitamin D deficiency.
Little is known about maternal preferences for different methods of vitamin D supplementation. Our aim was to assess maternal practices and preferences for vitamin D supplementation of their infants in primary care.
Mothers seeking care with infants for either 2-month or 4-month well-child visits were surveyed regarding vitamin D supplementation. Eligible mothers were aged 18 years and older, spoke English, and had an infant aged between 6 weeks and 5 months that was receiving primary care at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota. Practices included 1 urban site, 2 suburban sites, and 1 rural site.
We collected data regarding infant feeding practices, vitamin D supplementation, and maternal preferences for the mode of vitamin D supplementation. Response options included either supplementation of the baby or mother with vitamin D and either daily or monthly high-dose vitamin D. Mothers rated the importance of convenience, safety, being most natural, and cost in choosing between options for vitamin D supplementation.
The survey questionnaires were distributed to the mothers in the urban site in October 2013. Questionnaires were mailed to mothers at all 4 sites in November and December 2013. A second mailing was sent to nonrespondents 30 days later. The questionnaires had no patient-identifying information and included instructions not to complete it twice.
The Mayo Clinic Institution Review Board approved the study.
A total of 601 questionnaires were mailed, 438 nonrespondents were sent a second mailing, and 31 completed the survey during well-child visits. In all, 236 mothers completed the survey. We report results for the 140 mothers with exclusively breastfed infants and 44 who used both breast and formula milk.
Of the mothers, 138 (76%) were taking a multivitamin with vitamin D. Only 101 (55%) had supplemented their infants with vitamin D in the preceding week (median 5 d/wk), and 77 infants (42%) received the 400 IU recommended. The proportion of infants receiving supplementation did not vary by age (P = .46). A total of 134 (73%) reported that their clinician had recommended infant vitamin D supplementation, and these mothers were more likely to supplement their infants with vitamin D (OR = 8.3; 95% CI, 3.8–18). The 11 nonwhite mothers (4.9%) were more likely to supplement infants with vitamin D than white mothers (P = .04). Mothers rated ease of administering vitamin D supplementation as 4 on a scale of 1 to 5 (with 5 being easiest), but 6 of 105 respondents (5.7%) found administration burdensome (rated 1 or 2).
The great majority of breastfeeding mothers (88.4%) preferred supplementing themselves rather than their infants with vitamin D. Most expressed a desire for a daily supplementation (57%) compared with monthly supplementation. In rating the importance of factors informing their choices, mothers rated safety highest, and cost was rated lowest. First-time mothers and those who had additional children had similar preferences and value ratings.
Regarding reasons for not supplementing infants with vitamin D, many mothers indicated lack of knowledge about supplementation, some believed that breast milk provided infants with adequate vitamin D, and others chose not to supplement because of inconvenience or their infant’s apparent dislike of the supplement.
Less than one-half the infants in this study met the AAP recommendation for vitamin D supplementation of breastfed and bottle-fed infants. More mothers took a vitamin D supplement than provided their infants with a supplement, and a minority of breastfeeding mothers adequately supplemented their infants.
Most breastfeeding mothers preferred supplementing themselves rather than their infants, and most preferred daily rather than monthly supplementation. Advantages of maternal rather than infant supplementation include increased ease of administration, simultaneous mother and infant supplementation, and avoidance of potential toxicity to the infant from dosing errors.
High-dose maternal vitamin D supplementation (4000–6400 IU/d or a single monthly dose of 150,000 IU) can sufficiently enrich breast milk in nursing mothers, preventing vitamin D deficiency in their infants without evident toxicity.6,7 Mothers take a prenatal vitamin after delivery, so additional vitamin D could be incorporated in the maternal supplementation routine.
Our findings are limited by our study population of predominantly white mothers and might not apply to populations that are nonwhite or at a greater risk of vitamin D deficiency. Additionally, mothers who completed the questionnaire may have practices and preferences that are different from those of nonrespondents.
Promotion of breastfeeding as a complete nutritional source could be facilitated by providing adequate maternal vitamin D supplementation to breastfeeding mothers. Maternal choice of mode of supplementation may help ensure adequate vitamin D status for infants.